Random Phrase: Just like our design, we're clean and to the point...


Read Me First!

This is the Spode's Abode archive. The old articles and forum have been kept here purely for historical purposes and are no longer updated.

Not all portions of this archive may work as expected.


Please visit the new site.



Christmas DX9 Graphics Card Round Up
Written by Peter Barnard, Spode (12/12/2003)
Page 7 of 10

Untitled Document

Anti-Aliasing Benchmarks

With modern graphics, increasing the resolution of game play is no longer the way to improve what eyes see. Anisotropic Filtering, Anti-Aliasing and other such techniques are being used to enhance the image on the screen.

Anti Aliasing is a method of reducing the viewable "jaggies". This process smoothes the stepped edges by blending so they appear smooth. The pictures below show a very small part of a single frame from the "Battle of Proxycon" game test. The edge shown is the peak of a soldiers helmet, enlarged 300%.

No Anti-Aliasing
2x Anti-Aliasing
4x Anti-Aliasing
6x Anti-Aliasing

As you can see, the image looks systematically better as you up the sampling rate. When put back to their original picture sizes, you can imagine general image quality is greatly increased.

Obviously, this has a performance impact, so here are the average frames per second for the 3dmark 2003 game tests, run with no antialiasing, then 2x, 4x and 6x levels of Anti-Aliasing.

The difference figure is created from the average FPS of all the game tests and shows the performance difference between each type of Anti-Aliasing, compared with no Anti-Aliasing. All tests were still done at 1024x768.

The tests are:

  • Game Test 1: Wings of Fury
  • Game Test 2: Battle of Proxycon
  • Game Test 3: Trolls Lair
  • Game Test 4: Mother Nature
No AA
2x AA
4x AA
6x AA
GT1
GT2
GT3
GT4
GT1
GT2
GT3
GT4
Difference
GT1
GT2
GT3
GT4
Difference
GT1
GT2
GT3
GT4
Difference
Asus 9800 XT
211
45
38
36
189
32
28
34
- 17%
156
19
18
30
- 49%
111
11
11
23
- 53%
Sparkle 5900
188
34
29
22
162
23
21
21
- 21%
147
19
18
20
- 33%
Not supported
Gainward 5900
184
33
27
22
156
22
20
20
- 22%
139
17
17
20
- 37%
Not supported
Asus 9600 XT
141
23
21
23
117
16
15
21
- 20%
92
9
8
17
- 41%
66
5
4
14
- 58%
Sapphire 9600 Pro
132
20
19
19
110
14
13
18
- 20%
85
8
8
15
- 39%
58
5
5
12
- 58%
Sparkle 5600
116
13
12
7
90
8
8
7
- 25%
66
7
7
7
- 44%
Not supported
Terratec 5600
107
12
11
7
82
7
7
7
- 27%
58
6
6
7
- 45%
Not supported
Terratec 5200
54
4
3
4
27
2
2
4
- 50%
15
1
1
3
- 73%
Not supported

<< Back | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | | 5 | | 6 | | 7 | | 8 | | 9 | | 10 | Next >>



Copyright Andrew Miller
Please read our disclaimer

Search the site:

Random

Cardboard Box PC